Violence on bicycles benefits no one
I’m not going to pretend I don’t get angry on my bicycle. Whether it’s a pedestrian not looking where they are going, a car cutting me off or some random opening their door on me – almost weekly at some point somebody on the roads annoys me.
With my Long Haul Trucker equipped with an AirZound air horn however, a quick 120db blast is al that’s usually needed for the situation to resolve itself.
For those cyclists who don’t use an AirZound or similar device however, the only tools left are directly confrontational. You can shout at people, stick your finger up at them or in the extreme cases even vandalise an offending vehicle.
Unfortunately regardless of which side of the fence you’re on, be it aggressor or victim, confrontational violent behavior benefits no one.
On one side of the fence you have the aggressor.
Last week seventy one year old Mary Touma was walking along Gardeners Road in the suburb of Eastlakes, New South Wales.
An argument then broke out between Touma and a passing cyclist guy on a bike and he then pushed Touma. Touma fell backwards and hit her head on a brick wall.
She later died.
Having a look at Gardeners Road, it seems to be a large four lane road with no bicycle lane.
Given the cyclist guy on a bike was ‘wearing black pants, a dark-coloured top and white sneakers‘ and ‘aged in his 20s‘ I’m going to assume he didn’t have the road confidence to take up a lane on the road itself.
He also probably wasn’t wearing a helmet.
My guess would then be that the altercation between Touma and the guy on a bike was over him riding on what appears to be quite a small footpath on Gardeners Road.
Mrs Touma looks a bit like a nagger so I’m guessing guy on a bike had enough and shoved her to shut her up. She then fell over backwards and most likely hit her head on one of the low brick property fences seen in the map above.
Someone is dead over an argument about riding a bicycle on the footpath.
Firstly you shouldn’t be on the footpath to begin with and secondly just how hard is it to keep riding if some crabby old lady decides to get stuck into you?
What is pushing her over going to achieve? Regardless of how crabby Mary Touma might have been, any sense of self satisfaction as a result of pushing over little old ladies should be negated by the fact she’s a little old lady.
Kind of like winning a boxing match against a toddler. Amusing, maybe but certainly not a personal or moral victory by any stretch of the imagination.
One the otherside of the bicycle violence fence is then the victim.
David Rourke sounds like your typical lycra clad Sunday warrior cyclist. Rourke was out last Sunday cycling along Torquay Road in Geelong when he was cut off by ‘a vintage gold Ford XC or Chrysler‘.
Not too happy about it, Rourke stuck his finger up at the driver and that’s when things got ugly. The driver got out of the car and chased Rourke across the road before king hitting him.
Rourke went down and as a result of the attack will require
Two steel plates (t0) be inserted in his cheekbones once the swelling in his face goes down and doctors also expect they may have to screw his jaw together.
Worth it for a bit of road rage aggression?
Hardly.
When a cyclist is cut off however there’s not much you can do. I have my horn and that usually stops vehicles dead in their tracks. If all you’ve got is a bell, or worse still nothing then you’re pretty much left with no option but to suck it up.
You could have words with the driver at the next set of lights but no doubt that could just as easily turn ugly.
In Rourke’s case you could split hairs over whether the car cutting him off was the initial aggressor or whether it was the finger that did it but at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter.
What’s happened has happened and as Rourke lies in a hospital bed I’m sure it’s crossed his mind once wondering if it was worth it.
I don’t imagine there’s too many vintage gold Ford XC’s or Chrysler’s in the Geelong area so I imagine it won’t take too long to catch the driver. Regardless of his punishment however I still think avoiding the situation altogether would have been the better choice.
In both instances someone has come worse off as a direct result of aggression and violence mixing with bicycles. Unlike their car, truck and bus counterparts however cyclists usually have a lot more to lose when aggression gets out of control.
This is again replicated when a pedestrian is involved as they’re usually going to come off worse then a cyclist again.
As someone who rides around a fair bit I can honestly say that despite having a few of those moments that leave a bitter taste in your mouth for the next few hours, I’ve never completely blown my stack at someone.
People are unpredictable and it’s impossible to know if someone’s a crazy or not before you get involved in an argument with them.
Is it worth risking your health, or as in Mary Touma’s case, your life over?
I think it’s more important to get to where you’re going safely then to attempting a few seconds of life altering self gratification.
Keep safe on the roads guys.
Related posts that might interest you:


May 26th, 2010 at 5:56 pm James(Quote)
Unfortunately I had the displeasure of watching Kerri-Anne on Nine this morning (while stuck at home sick) and they were talking about cyclists/motorists.
The arrogant old woman basically said that cyclists should live & ride in seperate areas/ & new specially designed suburbs should be created for “cyclists”
May 26th, 2010 at 6:41 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Yeah I’ve got some footage of that. I’m at work now so haven’t been able to watch it but will probably be tommorows writeup.
What amuses me is Kerri Anne has a fitness section on her website.
May 27th, 2010 at 1:31 pm Anon(Quote)
Also she claimed that “cyclists congest motorways and the city” WTF, the last time I checked I go faster than a car in the city, and I am one less car on the road.
The next day, she also responded to backlash to her comments saying she conducted the interview fairly and valid points where made – the cyclist barely got a word in! she kept pushing for this “All cyclists should have a rego” BS that motorists think that will solve problems. It was a very one-sided and poor interview.
60 minutes also ran a story on cyclists VS motorists a few weeks ago
Its views like this in the media that are fueling the Cyclists/motorists flamewars, and not endeavoring to amend the situation.
Channel 9 Is lapping up all the Butthurt from both sides of the fight, and is using it to milk ratings rather than make a change for the good of all road users.
tl;dr – Channel 9 Loves to hate cyclists and milk them for ratings
May 27th, 2010 at 3:20 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Yeah the interview was quite loaded. I loved the car guys comments at the start. You could almost see the ‘wtf, that’s not what we rehearsed’ look in Kennerly’s eyes.
The interview might have been conducted fairly but Kennerley’s questions and commentary were definitely on the offensive.
May 27th, 2010 at 7:04 pm James(Quote)
There’s a discussion about the ramblings on KAK here;
http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=28255&sid=91cfc6934a311e60af9eb4994b45a14d
July 31st, 2011 at 2:30 pm P Buddery(Quote)
What about helmets and their effects on violence? Helmets can cause a rider’s head to get so hot that out-of-it behaviour, violence or even death can result.
As far as I am concerned, any Australian cyclist has a legal right to injure or kill anyone they feel like, and will continue to have this right so until the helmet laws are abolished or medical exemptions are reinstated for the benefit of cyclists who suffer from heat-related ill effects.
July 31st, 2011 at 6:52 pm ausGeoff(Quote)
I guess as a cyclist (but not a member of the “lycra-luvvie” set) and a driver in Melbourne, I can see both sides of the coin.
Personally, if I’m on my treadly and there’s a dedicated bike path or share path available, I always utilise it… I’m scared of far too many motorist’s behaviour, or lack thereof, literally.
Two unacceptable things that many other (usually younger?) cyclists do in a built-up suburban environment is excessive speeding and lane-splitting.
Most cyclists, when on a roadway, quite rightfully demand the use of a full traffic lane for their sole use and safety (just like a car, in fact) but when the motor traffic slows down, these same people suddenly expect to automatically “share” the cars’ lane, and cruise by on the cars’ left-hand and — inevitably — blind spot at 55km/h. And weave in and out of stationary (at that moment!) cars.
On the few occasions I have to pass a really slow and/or stationary car on its LHS, I always watch its LHS rear-vision mirror to see — as I should — the drivers face, and specifically his eye contact involvement. Or the more usual lack of!
As a driver, I always indicate and move out to the outer lane, which isn’t impossible as you, when a driver, should see a properly riding cyclist well enough ahead of time to do this safely. And yes, it may upset the cars in the “outer” lane when you do that maneuverer, but I’d prefer annoy a guy inside a 2-tonne metal cage, rather than kill a guy on a 12kg bike!
And if I can’t instantly move into the outer lane, well then I just have to grit my teeth as a driver, and bide my time until I can do so. Like all of maybe 20 seconds! Oh dear, what an unforgivable delay in my 90-minute car journey LOL.
I’ve also noticed — over many road km — a correlation between drivers who’re aggressive towards cyclists as being just as aggressive to other car drivers. In other words, it’s often their dysfunctional state of mind that causes this sort of road rage, so it’s not always necessarily directed solely towards cyclists just because they are cyclists — they simply hate everyone else on “their” roadway.
August 1st, 2011 at 12:54 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
@P Buddery
Time to stop wearing 1980′s stackhats mate! Even the cheapest decently built bicycle helmet these days should provide adequate ventilation.
If you’re talking metaphorically of course, well there’s still no excuse for violence – heat related or otherwise. If you can’t control your temper get off the roads.
August 2nd, 2011 at 12:38 am ausGeoff(Quote)
I’m guessing that P Buddery has his/her tongue very firmly planted in his/her cheek when making this assertion…
And I guess this proves it…
Because, if not, then we have a psychopath on our hands!
August 2nd, 2011 at 1:53 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Toungue in cheek did cross my mind but I’m a staunch advocate of wearing helmets so I’d be disagreeing anyway.
August 2nd, 2011 at 9:20 pm ausGeoff(Quote)
Yeppers.
I always wear my helmet, and don’t have the least problem with sweaty-head. And you’re right about the old Rosebank Stackhats — they were mobile cranial pizza ovens LOL.
October 5th, 2011 at 1:14 pm P Buddery(Quote)
I’m not a psychopath. I am a middle-aged fat bloke with $225.00 worth of the best-ventilated helmet I could buy 3 years ago. I can do a bit of work around the house and be dripping with sweat in the coldest part of an east cost winter. Yes, I appear to be made for a far colder climate than Australia.
NSW workcover acknowledges that insane, evil or fatal effects can result from people getting too hot at work, the RTA does not acknowledge that these very same effects can happen when people get their heads too hot from riding bikes wearing helmets.
So while the helmet legislation remains in force I may be legally required by law to kill people in insanely messy and unpleasant ways. In reality I shall not do so, preferring to cause massive embarassment and unease until the helmet legislation is repealed or the medical exemption scheme is reinstated and I am able to get one. I had one, years ago.
To conclude, if you are worried about being butchered by an insane cyclist, you are at greater risk from a backpacker from Europe or the USA who may go for a bike ride totally unaware of the risks, get too hot, kill some people, and die from massive brain damage in a pool of his or her own vomit.
P Buddery
October 5th, 2011 at 7:52 pm ausGeoff(Quote)
Yep, I’m a bit like this too…
I spent some time living and working in the UK, and I loved their climate, even in the peak of “summer” — like a maximum of 28°C LOL.
The only references I could find to this is for indoor workplaces:
The NSW WorkCover Authority has issued guidelines on indoor thermal comfort which describe optimal conditions for occupational health and safety in an office environment. These are outlined below:
♦optimum summer temperature range 21-24°C
♦acceptable summer temperature range 20-26°C
♦optimum humidity range 40-60%
♦minimum recommended fresh air rate 10 Litres per second (L/s) per person or 10 L/s per 10 m2 for mechanical ventilation systems
♦optimum air movement 0.1-0.5 m/s (naturally ventilated), 0.1-0.2 m/s (air-conditioned).
I’d be interested to see if you can dig up any info about outdoors working conditions—with specific reference to the negative over-heating effects on workers’ state of mind re anger or distress. The only info I could find was a one-size-fits-all “down tools” at 36°C (or whatever).
I wear a $170 helmet, and don’t have any overheating issues with the ol’ melon.
My sweating issues are groin (and armpits), and cycle knickers don’t really help.