I don’t have a problem with lesbians. I don’t mean that in a pseudo sleazy ‘eyyy wanna come back to my place with your friend?’ kind of way but rather that if two women love each other then best of luck to them.

In an age of single sex gyms, toilets, schools and the precedent set down by Peel Bar successfully gaining exemption from the equal opportunity act the fact is that it would be hypocritical to suggest gay women can’t have their own dance parties.

The Peel Hotel’s primary reason for seeking an exemption was to prevent “sexually based insults and violence” towards male homosexual patrons”. They sought to ban women and straight males from their venue.

However, Pinkalicious owner Julie MacKenzie makes a much more gender targeted attack and I can’t help but feel a sense of stereotypical ‘angry lesbian man bashing’ simmering below the surface.

Most men couldn’t be bothered with attending lesbian dance parties unless they were perhaps supporting a female friend or were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Eye candy is usually scarce, hundreds of accusing eyes burn into you and if girly drink prices in straight venues are anything to go by, they’re probably beyond ridiculous at lesbian events.

Still, I’m not going to pretend like it has a zero chance of happening but are the men that rock up to this event really as bad as MaKenzie makes them out to be?

Pinkalicious was given the green light to stop men because they might pester women for sex.


Really? Because that’s all us males do. Go out and pester women for sex. There couldn’t be any other possible reason males would be out enjoying themselves after dark. No we’re all out there pestering women for sex. Period.

“The feedback I was getting from the girls was that they wanted something exclusive for women to be able to express themselves in a safe environment.”


Oh nice, so we’re self-control lacking sexual predators and unsafe. Talk about sticking it to the man.

Whilst I’m not suggesting some sleazy men wouldn’t turn up to these events what begs the question is doesn’t Pinkalicious have security like everywhere else? In my experience if someone is seen to be harassing patrons they tend to get evicted pretty quickly. Quicker if a pretty young girl goes and complains to the bouncer on duty.

Putting aside logic though, even if they want their own female only parties that’s fine but was it really necessary to demonise men over it?

What ever happened to fitting in to society?

Now you can go to your same gender school, sit around in the Womyn’s room at university till you graduate, get a job at a women’s only gym and go out to exclusive women’s only events.

Sounds to me that despite harping on about society accepting gay and lesbians there’s still an awful lot of them that are hell bent on excluding themselves from everybody else. I mean what’s next, female only car lanes so that lesbian drivers can feel ‘safe’ on the roads?

What happens when they rock up to the supermarket register and the cashier is a straight male, do they drop their shopping basket and burst into tears?

I could continue and get even more sarcastic but I won’t.

I’ve been hit on three times in my life by gay males, twice at a bar and once randomly at work. Each time once I’ve worked out we were having more then a random chat I’ve politely declined and mentioned my love of the vagina.

I don’t see why it’s such a painful issue for the homosexual community to address in return.

VCAT granted Pinkalicious exemption from the equal opportunities act and I say best of luck to them. If having your own gender specific dance party is what it takes for lesbians to feel comfortable then by all means go ahead, I just wish they didn’t have to stereotypically pull out the man bashing to justify it.

Ironically Pinkalicious’ website lists the main dj for their next August event as one Mike Evans. Mike Evans obviously being a male dj I’m not too sure how that works.



No related posts.