Claiming a laser eye surgery rebate on Medicare
For whatever stupid reason the Australian government classes laser eye surgery (both lasik and PRK) as ‘cosmetic surgery’. The biggest drawback of this is that you are unable to directly make a claim on medicare for the costs of the procedure.
Fortunately though Australian’s receive a 20% rebate for net medical expenses over $1500 so you are able to recover some of your costs.
1. How the rebate works
The Medicare rebate isn’t specific to laser eye surgery and covers your net medical expenses if they are over $1500.
For example if you had an out of pocket surgery procedure done that cost $3000 as well as getting laser eye surgery that cost $2000 your net medical expenses are $5000.
When you are lodging your tax return you can claim up to 20% of the out of pocket difference over $1500.
In this case $5000 – $1500 is $3500 so you would be able to claim 20% of that net difference ($3500) entitling you to an additional $700 on your tax return.
If your laser eye surgery costs alone are over $1500 then similarly you are able to claim the 20% rebate. Make sure you have receipts from your procedures though in case you get audited by the taxation office.
2. Private health insurance
Note that the rebate applies for net out of pocket expenses only. If you have private health insurance that covers part of your procedure costs the medicare rebate applies only to what you paid after your health insurance claim.
For example my private health insurance paid out $1000 per eye and my gross lasik procedure cost was $5200. This meant that although the procedure cost $5200, I was only able to claim $3200 ($1000 per eye was paid by private health insurance) on my medicare rebate.
After subtracting the $1500 threshold from $3200 I was left with a claimable amount of $1700. 20% of $1700 is $340 which isn’t much when you consider the total cost of surgery was $5200 but nonetheless it’s still money that’s in my pocket rather then somebody elses.
Just a final note which I’m sure is going to cross everybody’s mind who makes a medicare claim on their eye surgery, I would advise against trying to claim the total amount of the surgery on your claim if you made a private health insurance claim.
I did think about putting the whole surgery amount on my tax return as it brought the claimable amount up to about $700 but decided against it at the end. I figured given the tax office have access to my medicare and private health insurance records it wouldn’t be too difficult for them to pick it up and audit me.
Etax has it written in bold that you can only claim the net difference after ‘any private health insurance claims‘ so I didn’t like my chances of pulling the ‘oh but I didn’t understand’ routine to get out of it if I was audited.
Related posts that might interest you:



June 6th, 2010 at 9:33 pm Matt(Quote)
Hi what was your private health insurance to get back $1000 per eye? If you read this could you let me no my email is (email address removed)
thanks
June 8th, 2010 at 3:48 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
Gday Matt, I was with Defence Health at the time.
July 4th, 2010 at 7:51 pm Costa(Quote)
It would be great to be able to have this in a simple calculator that you paid this and you can claim that! I find that its amazing that even with private health cover you need to spend as much time as you would lodging your tax return to claim back a rebate.
The question is that is if they changed the classification from “cosmetic surgery” would that mean more people would undergo the procedure or would just more people be able to claim a tax break?
I understand that a lot of people need the procedure for work, but there are also a number of people that get it because they want a slight improvement…
July 5th, 2010 at 2:33 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Well the formula is simple, if you spend more then $1500 on laser eye surgery you can claim anything over back. Windows calculator should do the job ok…
.
I’d say more people would under go it. Private health insurance and the cost puts laser eye surgery out of reach financially for a lot people. I’m not saying the taxpayer should pay for the operation entirely but some contribution would be nice. After all if eligible, it’s cheaper in the long run rather then subsidising contact lenses and glasses over a lifetime.
Maybe have a number cutoff then. For me I was pretty much blind beyond a distance of a meter without glasses contacts prior to getting my surgery. Getting the surgery done so I wouldn’t have to worry about contact lenses and glasses overseas wasn’t a cosmetic choice for me, it was more lifestyle comfort thing.
July 5th, 2010 at 2:51 pm Costa(Quote)
but you get the idea, it is made to be much more complex than it is…
ok so the point about the long term benefits, the question is who is responsible for the long term costs associated with complications…
fair point that its a lifestyle issue but i would guess that drawing that line is tough enough for Govt or Doctors to police…
July 5th, 2010 at 2:58 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Well laser eye surgery isn’t a 100% foolproof procedure, no surgery is. Depending on what went wrong and if the treatment was covered by Medicare then who pays for treatment is pretty straight forward.
Lasik is elective surgery (although I’d strongly argue not purely cosmetic) and comes with it’s own possible complications. If you choose to get it done you should be prepared for these complications to occur both mentally and financially.
There’s no such thing as risk free surgery.
July 11th, 2010 at 11:32 pm leigh(Quote)
We have private health insurance with AHM and there is only 1 of the plans that covers you for eye surgery and you have to be with that plan for 3 yrs
July 13th, 2010 at 2:25 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Yeah with the increase of people who get the surgery I imagine the health insurance companies will up the requirements to get it covered.
Over time more people trust the technology and the technology and techniques get better too so that all contributes to more people opting for it. Only so much insurance to go around so up go the insurance claim eligibility requirements.