<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New 220g Cadbury Chocolate blocks are absolute rubbish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/</link>
	<description>because criticism isn&#039;t an armchair sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odette</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-43293</link>
		<dc:creator>Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-43293</guid>
		<description>I am so disappointed with Cadbury!!! What blatant disregard they have with their customers.  I&#039;d be interested now to know how their &#039;palm oil&#039; experiment went and how it improved the market for them.  Who was the bright spark that OK&#039;d that change to the product?  Probably ended up with a bonus on top of it.

I used to insist my husband only bought me Cadbury chocolate now to add to his confusion I instead insist on no Cadbury chocolate at all.  It has effected every one of their products, not just the blocks, but also the chocolate bars like Crunchie bars &amp; Time outs.  The chocolate is a sickly sweet product that covers them now.

I noted on TV the other day that Cadbury advertises &quot;A glass and a half of smoothness&quot;

What happened to &quot;A glass and a half of rich full cream milk&quot;?

Can anyone tell me why any company would change a product that is excellent to one that didn&#039;t sell?

I&#039;d be interested in the history of the dialogue that took place that led to the changes Cadbury in chocolate to what it is today.  For your information it is still bad, something has been lost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so disappointed with Cadbury!!! What blatant disregard they have with their customers.  I&#8217;d be interested now to know how their &#8216;palm oil&#8217; experiment went and how it improved the market for them.  Who was the bright spark that OK&#8217;d that change to the product?  Probably ended up with a bonus on top of it.</p>
<p>I used to insist my husband only bought me Cadbury chocolate now to add to his confusion I instead insist on no Cadbury chocolate at all.  It has effected every one of their products, not just the blocks, but also the chocolate bars like Crunchie bars &amp; Time outs.  The chocolate is a sickly sweet product that covers them now.</p>
<p>I noted on TV the other day that Cadbury advertises &#8220;A glass and a half of smoothness&#8221;</p>
<p>What happened to &#8220;A glass and a half of rich full cream milk&#8221;?</p>
<p>Can anyone tell me why any company would change a product that is excellent to one that didn&#8217;t sell?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in the history of the dialogue that took place that led to the changes Cadbury in chocolate to what it is today.  For your information it is still bad, something has been lost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill mccoy</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-36988</link>
		<dc:creator>bill mccoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-36988</guid>
		<description>l got a big block of Cadburys last night at safeways and pay $3.00 for it and it was not the same, it was 200g and not 240g and it was so thin and it did not tast the same to, l will not buy cadbury no more. 

Cadburys was the best chocolate and l am 53 years old and l say bye bye to cadburys.................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>l got a big block of Cadburys last night at safeways and pay $3.00 for it and it was not the same, it was 200g and not 240g and it was so thin and it did not tast the same to, l will not buy cadbury no more. </p>
<p>Cadburys was the best chocolate and l am 53 years old and l say bye bye to cadburys&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozsoapbox</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-36734</link>
		<dc:creator>ozsoapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-36734</guid>
		<description>Whilst I&#039;m sure the retail chocolate market is competitive, there&#039;s simply no excuse for shrinking your product size and continually changing the recipe of a product that your market intimately know the taste of.

I&#039;m sure Cadburys will be a case study in how to completely mess up your business model in the years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I&#8217;m sure the retail chocolate market is competitive, there&#8217;s simply no excuse for shrinking your product size and continually changing the recipe of a product that your market intimately know the taste of.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Cadburys will be a case study in how to completely mess up your business model in the years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadburys Never Again</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-36711</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadburys Never Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-36711</guid>
		<description>Good to see all the bad feed back.
I personally went on a diet last March (2010) and spent several month doing research removing (Vegetable Fat) and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil from my diet. That&#039;s another story. But I still wanted my occasional treats.

Anyhow I kindly sent an email to Cadbury&#039;s (Australia) in May 2010 asking weather they used Hydrogenated Vegetable oil there answer was yes.

Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil = (Vegetable Fat) = Trans Fat.
&quot;As most vegetables that contain fats are liquid not solid.&quot;
(Which increase cholesterol + Heart Attacks, Etc

Check out this web site for the possible Trans Fat Replacement.
Web Link: http://www.theheart.org/article/765927.do
Possibly the next replacement for cocoa butter.

Anyhow Today I noticed they changed to a different recipe which now contains (Cocoa Mass) ???? minus Vegetable Fat.

Regardless now I will never buy Cadbury&#039;s again as they keep
messing with their products but so do a lot of other manufacturers. Keep your eyes open.

What annoys me is the info on there web site admitting to it
link below, But don&#039;t inform you on the label until you read
the small text in ingredients.
When there&#039;s a new cheaper Fat they will do it all over
again and not tell us they have lost my trust.

http://www.cadbury.co.nz/about-cadbury/frequently-asked-questions.aspx

I&#039;m now 100% converted to Lindt. 
(Which is how real chocolate is made.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see all the bad feed back.<br />
I personally went on a diet last March (2010) and spent several month doing research removing (Vegetable Fat) and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil from my diet. That&#8217;s another story. But I still wanted my occasional treats.</p>
<p>Anyhow I kindly sent an email to Cadbury&#8217;s (Australia) in May 2010 asking weather they used Hydrogenated Vegetable oil there answer was yes.</p>
<p>Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil = (Vegetable Fat) = Trans Fat.<br />
&#8220;As most vegetables that contain fats are liquid not solid.&#8221;<br />
(Which increase cholesterol + Heart Attacks, Etc</p>
<p>Check out this web site for the possible Trans Fat Replacement.<br />
Web Link: <a href="http://www.theheart.org/article/765927.do" rel="nofollow">http://www.theheart.org/article/765927.do</a><br />
Possibly the next replacement for cocoa butter.</p>
<p>Anyhow Today I noticed they changed to a different recipe which now contains (Cocoa Mass) ???? minus Vegetable Fat.</p>
<p>Regardless now I will never buy Cadbury&#8217;s again as they keep<br />
messing with their products but so do a lot of other manufacturers. Keep your eyes open.</p>
<p>What annoys me is the info on there web site admitting to it<br />
link below, But don&#8217;t inform you on the label until you read<br />
the small text in ingredients.<br />
When there&#8217;s a new cheaper Fat they will do it all over<br />
again and not tell us they have lost my trust.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cadbury.co.nz/about-cadbury/frequently-asked-questions.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.cadbury.co.nz/about-cadbury/frequently-asked-questions.aspx</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m now 100% converted to Lindt.<br />
(Which is how real chocolate is made.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-36709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-36709</guid>
		<description>A Cadbury block of topdeck or black forest used to be a weekend must have for me, until they introduced vegetable fat and i made the switch to lindt or the coles stuff.

I&#039;m not sure if the old recipe is back or not, because i&#039;m also not paying $5 to lose 1/4 of the block either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Cadbury block of topdeck or black forest used to be a weekend must have for me, until they introduced vegetable fat and i made the switch to lindt or the coles stuff.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the old recipe is back or not, because i&#8217;m also not paying $5 to lose 1/4 of the block either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HenryJay</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-34324</link>
		<dc:creator>HenryJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-34324</guid>
		<description>I thought something had happened to me and that I&#039;d gone off Cadbury chocolate naturally but they actually changed the recipe the idiots after I&#039;ve pigged out happily on them for almost 30 years. 

It&#039;s been a year now since I&#039;ve eat their new unimproved chocolate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought something had happened to me and that I&#8217;d gone off Cadbury chocolate naturally but they actually changed the recipe the idiots after I&#8217;ve pigged out happily on them for almost 30 years. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a year now since I&#8217;ve eat their new unimproved chocolate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Lyn</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-21437</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-21437</guid>
		<description>Awesome write up, could have not said it better myself! Love the bit when you wrote - Newsflash: MY TASTEBUDS HAVE NO FREAKING EYES THEY CAN’T SEE THE SHAPE OF THE SQUARE! So utterly true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome write up, could have not said it better myself! Love the bit when you wrote &#8211; Newsflash: MY TASTEBUDS HAVE NO FREAKING EYES THEY CAN’T SEE THE SHAPE OF THE SQUARE! So utterly true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maroon</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator>Maroon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-17461</guid>
		<description>I have had a good belly laugh reading this article and all the above comments...

now a warning to all you chocaholics out there...cut back while you can...you will thank me when you are old enough to start getting your blood cholesterol tested, discover it is too high, as is your weight and you are forced to start dieting.. against the will of your tastebuds and excercising against the will of your joints. 

The combined complaints of all your extraneous body parts will drive you mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a good belly laugh reading this article and all the above comments&#8230;</p>
<p>now a warning to all you chocaholics out there&#8230;cut back while you can&#8230;you will thank me when you are old enough to start getting your blood cholesterol tested, discover it is too high, as is your weight and you are forced to start dieting.. against the will of your tastebuds and excercising against the will of your joints. </p>
<p>The combined complaints of all your extraneous body parts will drive you mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozsoapbox</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-17442</link>
		<dc:creator>ozsoapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-17442</guid>
		<description>cue Cadbury issuing a press release advising that Australian families have told them they don&#039;t want actual nuts in their roasted almond chocolate blocks.

Was it a once off mistake or have Cadbury gone off the deep end and removed all nuts from their range lol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cue Cadbury issuing a press release advising that Australian families have told them they don&#8217;t want actual nuts in their roasted almond chocolate blocks.</p>
<p>Was it a once off mistake or have Cadbury gone off the deep end and removed all nuts from their range lol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke-Marzy</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-17432</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke-Marzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-17432</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no fucking nuts in my roasted almond...

Where the fuck are my nuts ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no fucking nuts in my roasted almond&#8230;</p>
<p>Where the fuck are my nuts ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-14749</link>
		<dc:creator>carol fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-14749</guid>
		<description>I agree with every one else but have noticed that now you have to READ EVERYTHING IN THE LIST OF INGREDIENTS BECAUSE SOME OF THEM STILL HAVE VEGETABLE  FAT IN THEM EVEN  HAVE THE HIDE TO SAY SAME GREAT TASTE. 

Well they arn`t and the hazel nut is so different since they have taken out the WHOLE NUTS. Infact i did send an email to say some one may sue because there seems to be bits of shell left. have you ever tried to eat shell you almost break a tooth.

I dont think they can recover from this BIG MISTAKE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with every one else but have noticed that now you have to READ EVERYTHING IN THE LIST OF INGREDIENTS BECAUSE SOME OF THEM STILL HAVE VEGETABLE  FAT IN THEM EVEN  HAVE THE HIDE TO SAY SAME GREAT TASTE. </p>
<p>Well they arn`t and the hazel nut is so different since they have taken out the WHOLE NUTS. Infact i did send an email to say some one may sue because there seems to be bits of shell left. have you ever tried to eat shell you almost break a tooth.</p>
<p>I dont think they can recover from this BIG MISTAKE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozsoapbox</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-14506</link>
		<dc:creator>ozsoapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 08:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-14506</guid>
		<description>Cadbury announced back in August 09 that they were dropping palm oil from their chocolate line. The fact that you can walk into a supermarket today and &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; buy palm oil Cadbury choclate speaks volumes about their commitment and passion of their flagship product.

Cadbury clearly don&#039;t care about their once loyal customer base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadbury announced back in August 09 that they were dropping palm oil from their chocolate line. The fact that you can walk into a supermarket today and <em>still</em> buy palm oil Cadbury choclate speaks volumes about their commitment and passion of their flagship product.</p>
<p>Cadbury clearly don&#8217;t care about their once loyal customer base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenni</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-14480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-14480</guid>
		<description>I too got the response from Cadbury in &#039;09 that they were changing back to their old recipe. The better part of a year later I have not yet found that to be true. The choc is still garbage. Gritty and grainy. 

I am so sick of products being changed for the betterment of the balance sheet and not the consumer. They just don&#039;t get it that they lose customers when they do this type of thing. Less customers, less profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too got the response from Cadbury in &#8217;09 that they were changing back to their old recipe. The better part of a year later I have not yet found that to be true. The choc is still garbage. Gritty and grainy. </p>
<p>I am so sick of products being changed for the betterment of the balance sheet and not the consumer. They just don&#8217;t get it that they lose customers when they do this type of thing. Less customers, less profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-13712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-13712</guid>
		<description>With the economy, education and employment issues not going so good we Australians do need some good vices.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the economy, education and employment issues not going so good we Australians do need some good vices&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozsoapbox</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-13697</link>
		<dc:creator>ozsoapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-13697</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Very disappointed with Cadbury – why make the chocolate so thin!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because apparently that&#039;s what Australian&#039;s want. Working families aren&#039;t worried about the economy, education, employment or the state of Australia... they&#039;re worried about the thickness of their chocolate blocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Very disappointed with Cadbury – why make the chocolate so thin!!</p></blockquote>
<p>Because apparently that&#039;s what Australian&#039;s want. Working families aren&#039;t worried about the economy, education, employment or the state of Australia&#8230; they&#039;re worried about the thickness of their chocolate blocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-13693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-13693</guid>
		<description>Very disappointed with Cadbury - why make the chocolate so thin!!  Have now switched to Whittakes&#039;s (their coconut block is so yummy)!  Bye Bye Cadbury...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disappointed with Cadbury &#8211; why make the chocolate so thin!!  Have now switched to Whittakes&#8217;s (their coconut block is so yummy)!  Bye Bye Cadbury&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-11794</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-11794</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t afford cadbury chocolate so I&#039;ve switched to stale bread and crackers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t afford cadbury chocolate so I&#8217;ve switched to stale bread and crackers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-6333</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-6333</guid>
		<description>Anyone had a Peppermint Pattie  or a Coconut Rough latley , thin as buggery ...... they used to be really thick, not now, they&#039;re  like a thin biscuit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone had a Peppermint Pattie  or a Coconut Rough latley , thin as buggery &#8230;&#8230; they used to be really thick, not now, they&#8217;re  like a thin biscuit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-6332</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-6332</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m beginning to suspect a cunning ploy here - bring in the smaller bars + add the dreaded fat, ride out the mass of complaints, then take the fat back out &#039;due to consumer feedback&#039; but keep the smaller sized bars. Consumers happy, company happy.

(I&#039;ve only tried the new version of Snack, and haven&#039;t bought any of the new improved smaller choc bars since. My wife switched to Lindt and I&#039;ve switched to dried apricots &amp; almonds for my snacking.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to suspect a cunning ploy here &#8211; bring in the smaller bars + add the dreaded fat, ride out the mass of complaints, then take the fat back out &#8216;due to consumer feedback&#8217; but keep the smaller sized bars. Consumers happy, company happy.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve only tried the new version of Snack, and haven&#8217;t bought any of the new improved smaller choc bars since. My wife switched to Lindt and I&#8217;ve switched to dried apricots &amp; almonds for my snacking.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murrayNE</title>
		<link>http://ozsoapbox.com/personal/new-220g-cadbury-chocolate-blocks-are-absolute-rubbish/#comment-6331</link>
		<dc:creator>murrayNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ozsoapbox.com/?p=3086#comment-6331</guid>
		<description>&quot;A glass and a half-arsed effort from Cadbury.&quot;

Give that man a hand.  Exemplary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A glass and a half-arsed effort from Cadbury.&#8221;</p>
<p>Give that man a hand.  Exemplary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

