The absurdity of the blanket acknowledgement of traditional Aboriginal land owners first hit me back in high school. I was in year seven from memory and it was an assembly marking the establishment of the school.

To kick start the assembly an acknowledgement was made to the traditional Aboriginal land owners of the area. As I sat in the audience watching this strange little ceremony I couldn’t help but wonder what, if anything, anyone was getting out of it.

Fast forward to 2010 and not much has changed.

Tony Abbott recently caused a bit of a stir when he had the balls to publicly raise what I suspect a lot of Australian’s have been thinking;

“Kevin Rudd is not an old-style lefty… but the Labor Party is full of people who are, and I guess this is the kind of genuflection to political correctness that these guys feel they have to make,” he said.

Mr Abbott cited Mr Rudd’s speech at last week’s Australian Medical Association parliamentary dinner in Canberra as an occasion at which a nod to the land’s traditional owners was inappropriate.

“There’s a place for this in the right circumstances but certainly there are many occasions when it does look like tokenism,” he said today.


Now I know that Mr. Abbott’s intentions in raising this point are quite possibly purely political but even so, he does raise a valid point.

Is acknowledging traditional Aboriginal landowners little more then a hollow token gesture?

I certainly think so. If you’re holding some event related to Aboriginals in particular then by all means pay your respects to the people that once roamed there. I don’t really care if you do or not but it’s your call to make.

If whatever it is that’s going on has absolutely nothing to do with Aboriginals or Aboriginal affairs, why exactly are we acknowledging them again? And why stop there, why not acknowledge the previous tenants of your residence the next time you hold a party.

Or hang a photo from the rear view mirror of the previous owner the next time you buy a second hand car.

It all does seem a bit silly.

As a young Australian the sentiment is completely hollow and beyond tokenism. It’s like saying grace at the table because your parents did despite you not believing a word of it.

Frankly I don’t really care who inhabited whatever land before I happened to be attending whatever formal ceremony was now being held on it. If they did nothing to contribute to the current state of events, other then running around hunting some kangaroos a couple of hundred years ago, then why do they deserve my recognition?

Yes the British could have handled occupation a bit better and it’s a tragedy that so many Aboriginal lives were lost but Aboriginals didn’t even have a system of land ownership to begin with. Get over it already.

In a similar vein of the abysmal state of Aboriginal welfare it seems traditional land acknowledgement is yet another example of modern day Aboriginals living in the past.

Naturally after stirring the bleeding heart hornet nest that is the cornerstone of latte politics in Australia, it didn’t take long for people to publicly disagree with Abbott’s remarks.

NSW Premier Kristina Keneally stated that

acknowledging traditional owners at official ceremonies is an appropriate way of recognising indigenous people

I’m more inclined to take advice from Aboriginal people, from elders, from our indigenous leaders, than I am from Tony Abbott on this subject.


“Hey guys, do you want us to stop acknowledging you everytime someone so much as farts in public?”

“Yeah, no we’re right cheers.”

Of course Aboriginal leaders are going to support the continued show of recognition of their people, no matter how far removed from Aboriginal rights or relevence the event being held the recognition is presented at.

The question being raised isn’t whether they are comfortable with it but rather does it mean anything to the rest of the Australian population.

I mean traditional land ownership acknowledgement at an Australian Medical Association dinner… really?

Next in line to swing the bat was Curtin University Centre for Aboriginal Studies director Anita Lee Hong.

Hong made a public announcement calling for an apology from Abbott citing

It’s a way that non-Aboriginal people can show respect for Aboriginal people, building on our heritage and our ongoing relationship.


I’m all for respect as I see no point in disrespecting people for the sake of it. However just what exactly are we respecting by acknowledging at a medical association dinner that Aboriginals once ran around the area?

Then there’s the issue of respect being a two way street and all. I mean it’s not like non-aboriginal people do nothing to show respect towards Aboriginals. What exactly do Aboriginals do apart from going around telling the people of Australia ‘it’s not enough’ and demanding we pay them more money?

Why pretend like Aboriginals have a choice in the matter or that we’re actually going to listen to them if they objected to whatever event we asked them to attend and throw their blessing behind.

‘Sorry guys, we’ve had to call off this years Australian Medical Association dinner because the traditional land owners didn’t approve’.

Token acknowledgement indeed.

And what must it be like from an Aboriginal (non leader) perspective. It’d kind of be like Britain taking control of the Australian parliament and then requesting we attend every dinner party, afternoon tea or shopping mall opening to acknowledge the now defunct Australian parliament.

I don’t really see how modern day Aboriginals are benefiting from this acknowledgement at all. It’s not like we’re all going to forget who was living in Australia before the British arrived. I mean history is still taught in schools right?

If Aboriginals are worried people will forget they roamed Australia for 40,000 years before the British arrived then make it a question on our citizenship test or something. If you want acknowledgement as a race then how about doing something acknowledgeable.

Simply existing just doesn’t cut it.



Related posts that might interest you:
  1. Aboriginal Finance: Spend 10 million to loan 2 million
  2. Why Aboriginal law has no place in Australian courts
  3. Government supresses Bath report on Aboriginal kids
  4. Aboriginal flag too valuable to use on Australia Day
  5. An Australian republic means Aboriginal sovereignty?