Stephen Conroy shows off his internet illiteracy
You’d think Minister Stephen Conroy, the man proposing the biggest regulatory change to the Australian internet in history, would have a firm grasp of the internet.
I mean he doesn’t need to know the technical specifics on say an engineering level of how it works, but y’know, is a basic understanding too much to ask?
At the launch of Australia’s National Cyber Security Awareness Week recently, this is what Stephen Conroy had to say;
There’s a staggering number of Australians being in having their computers infected at the moment, up to 20,000… uh… can regularly be getting infected by these spams or scams, that come through the portal.
Read over or listen to Conroy’s statement again, just incase it didn’t completely not make any sense the first time around.
This is Australia’s broadband minister speaking in public about the internet. Forget speechwriters and slip ups, even on a personal knowledge level could you sound any more incompetent about the internet if you tried?
Forget Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran… it sounds like we need to be deploying everything we’ve got against this mystical internet portal thingy. Lest it engulf our internets at a staggering rate of 20,000 innocent Australian’s computers ‘regularly‘.
I wonder if Conroy’s internet filter would stop the attack of the portal?
Probably not.
In other news, the Labor government announced today it was considering an ISP level data retention system. What does that mean? Well it means that
One internet service provider (ISP) source told ZDNet Australia that the Australian regime, if implemented, could go as far as recording each URL a customer visited and all emails.
hey said the regime being considered by the Australian Government could see data held for much longer than EU Directive time of 24 months — it would be more like five or ten years.
So we’re looking at the early stages of the Australian government thinking about retaining every internet users browsing history and email communications for five to ten years. This after they’ve also censored our internet to buggery.
Thankfully however Internet Industry Association CEO, Peter Coroneos, is assuring everyone that
there wouldn’t be any intention, I wouldn’t think, to move to any policy position on this unless there was a full public debate about the proposal.
Right, because we all know how well that worked out with the internet filter. I’m still waiting for someone from government to ask me whether I want it or not.
It seems quite clear the direction the Labor government is planning to take Australia’s internet use over the next five to ten years. Yes you can have a lightning speed network but you can only visit sites we classify as appropriate. Oh, and just incase you get up to anything we don’t like we’re going to log your every movement and keep it on file.
Whoosh!
Sorry, that was the sound of my confidence in the government being sucked through the ‘portal‘…
Related posts that might interest you:



June 12th, 2010 at 6:20 am Harry(Quote)
If the filter worked as advertised how could one possibly access illegal websites. Would that not defeat the purpose of recording internet history?
June 12th, 2010 at 8:14 pm Phil(Quote)
This is just the beginning of the police state.
June 13th, 2010 at 8:01 am Craig(Quote)
This latest Labor debacle will tip a lot more people over the line against the mandatory filter even if the Rudd government came out with a denial or, much less likely, an admission that they were wrong to consider storing all Australians’ web browsing and email histories for 5-10 years.
And the supposed shadow Communications Minister remains totally useless at opposing Conroy.
Labor is going to keep losing votes but the Liberals won’t be getting them either. I certainly would find it hard to vote for either party right now.
June 13th, 2010 at 3:06 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
I’ve been seeing the news articles claiming Rudd is a ‘dead politician walking’ over the miner tax, which by co-incidence I completely support. I’m by no means a Labor fan but have no idea what the Liberal’s policy on filters and all this internet spying busines is either.
Being in Taiwan I can only go off the media reports I see, what’s the general feeling over there? Are things for Rudd (and by proxy Conroy) really that bad?
June 15th, 2010 at 11:18 pm John Smith(Quote)
I think I will be following Oz’s example soon and leaving this country for another that upholds individual freedoms; perhaps China or Iran, maybe Albania. It would have to better than the direction Australia is heading under the ‘leadership’ of “The Dudd” and his cohorts.