Let's not celebrate the fatties just yet.
Lizzie Miller (yeah I have no idea who she is either), recently appeared in Glamour magazine in an unairbrushed photo showing a bit of belly flab.
Possibly because an unairbrushed photo is so rare these days, or the fact that so is printed belly flab nonetheless the magazine was inundated with messages of support.
I couldn’t help but notice the messages of support seemed to be from presumably overweight females thanking Glamour magazine for making them feel better about themselves.
With 60% of the Australian adult population being overweight in 2000, do we really want to encourage people to think that being fat is now somehow natural or acceptable?
67% of males and 52% of females being overweight made the numbers that rounded off the aforementioned study. At almost 70%, it’s not just the females who aren’t pulling their weight. And if the numbers sound high to you, step outside and have a good look around.
Everywhere you look pavement breakers are walking around strutting their stuff.
“I love this picture. I was starting to despair of ever seeing real women in magazines and it made me reassess how I look at myself. I have a similar tummy, which I hate – but look at her, she’s beautiful.”

The above was just one of the comments in support of the Miller photo. Now don’t get me wrong, apart from a bit of thunder thighs going on I don’t think Miller is a doughnut queen.
Sure the belly could do with a bit of work but if you look at the more balanced photo to the right you can see that the shot they published deliberately paints Millers stomach in it’s worst looking light.
The danger as I see it is that magazines will start to realise the market for making overweight women feel good about themselves and milk this insecurity for all it’s worth.
Not that I read magazines and am all of a sudden going to be disappointed, I mean I’m sure Zoo, FHM et al. will still give me something airbrushingly impossible to look at while I wait in line at 7-11, but I do worry about the effects of soothing this insecurity.
I’m not about to advocate full scale fatty bashing but I do think we’re going too far in the opposite direction. It’s true that models don’t have to be wafer thin but does anybody really think putting fat people into magazines is any healthier?
Average to me is inbetween the wafer and the lard and should be represented as such.
Myer recently launched a fashion season and featured plus size “models” alongside their flagship clothes rack Jennifer Hawkins. I’m not too knowledgeable on women’s clothing sizes but if the photo in the article is anything to go by, a size 16 is definitely tipping the scales.
Myer director of apparel Judy Coomber said it was the first time plus-size models had been included in the twice-yearly round of parades that traditionally start the retailer’s new season.
She said plus-size brands were an increasingly important part of Myer’s offerings.
“This business is a growing business for us and it’s really important to us in terms of our complete offering to all of our customers,” she said.
I appreciate the fact that with an overweight population the fat clothes industry must be booming but does anyone seriously think they’re in fashion being a size 16? No matter how nice you’re face is I’m still just going to see a walking twinkie wearing some clothes.
From magazines to catwalks this fat culture is slowly creeping into our society. And then what? In ten years from now will a size 16 be considered unrealistic as throngs of size 20 women complain that it’s un-natural and not representative of the average body?
We don’t go to movies to watch average actors, watch sport to see average atheletes compete or go to restraunts to eat food cooked by average cooks – so why the change in modelling?
And in a glamour magazine? Women shouldn’t even be reading glamour magazines let alone judging the content in them.
If you need proof of this just go to a bridesmaid fitting session and watch the cattiness unfurl as best friends argue over why the chosen dresses suit everyone else but themselves. Or visit a shoe shop and witness the jealousy that ensues when one woman sees another try on a shoe they could never themselves pull off.
No, unable to separate themselves from the content, women make terrible critics of glamour. If they had their way we’d all be shopping at plus size stores reading magazines featuring models so large they’d have to be printed in widescreen.
Miller isn’t fat but instead rests somewhere in that grey area of borderline territory. Personally it’s a little too close to that line for comfort. Without the disgust and disadvantage shown to fatties by society what incentive do they have to improve their bodies.
Surely 60% of the population don’t just suffer from the mythical big bone gene.
We shouldn’t be ready to celebrate fat people so readily yet, in doing so I think we admit to ourselves as a society that weight management is truly a lost cause. That my podgy friends is one battle I’m not ready to give up on just yet.
No related posts.


September 7th, 2009 at 8:48 am Citizen-D(Quote)
The model in those photos is in no way big or overweight (going by just those two photos). The model in the Jennifer Hawkins link is. Having said that, yes we do have a very big weight problem (no pun intended). I was at a major shopping centre at the weekend and I’ve come to the conclusion that I have lost all touch with modern society. From the morbidly obese, to the “hip” young guys that wear shorts, t shirts and bare feet on a 13 degree day (with the obligatory I-just-got-out-of-bed hairstyle that took them 45 minutes to achieve with “product”) to the 14 year old girls that shop at Sexual Predator’s Delight. So either these are the fashions that these magazines are flogging or those magazines must be close to going out of business. Unless people buy them, read them, then think “yeah – these size 20 lycra pants will look ok on me while i stand in line at KFC for my Family Bucket” anyway.
September 7th, 2009 at 9:40 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
Yeah she’s definately not overweight (although the thighs don’t match the upstairs real estate), but my worry is that the people praising the photo are 200kg balloons suddenly under the impression their all susperstar normal and that we want to see more of them.
I appreciate some guys are chubby chasers and each to their own but mainstream obesity? Hell no.
Totally with you on the shopping centre phenomena. I’m surprised the police haven’t set up ‘child protection erection patrol’ and started hauling anyone in who cracks a boner in the food court. Strangely enough I’ve never seen magazines with prostitute style clothing (maybe they don’t get featured on the covers) so I think it’s probably more of a case of walking into a clothing store and having no alternative choice.
September 7th, 2009 at 9:59 am Vince(Quote)
A trend I’m noticing is chicks cutting their hair short. What’s the deal with that! I thought that happened AFTER marriage
Some very weird fashion statements going on these days. Who’s putting this stuff in women’s heads?
What’s wrong with a normal chick (not too skinny or too fat), and long hair?
September 7th, 2009 at 2:55 pm James(Quote)
What happened to the Dance you A$$ off show in Channel Nine. How come that got booted off after the first episode. Where was all the support from the size 16 and up…!!!
September 7th, 2009 at 3:06 pm Rachel(Quote)
I think that comes from chicks getting it from Pink. She makes it work. I had really long hair all my life but i found i couldn’t tie it up as it gave me instant Headaches and keeping it down it just got in the way (plus the kids kept pulling it etc) so i got it all chopped…
September 7th, 2009 at 4:34 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Fatties only like seeing dignified representations of themselves. Jigglying your wobbly bits in the name of entertainment doesn’t fit their ‘we are beautiful’ motif.
Despite not finding Pink attractive (too many spots and mascara ew) I agree I don’t mind that hairstyle on women. So long it’s not dykalicious mullet short then short hair is ok with me. Oh and silly little ponytails on the top of the head with short hair on girls is definately out!
September 7th, 2009 at 6:52 pm Elle(Quote)
Funny you should mention this, I’ve just finished a story on it, interviewed a University of Otago, New Zealand, health lecturer and she said it isn’t always healthy to celebrate curvy women. Because you know, of the health issues that are associated with it.
September 8th, 2009 at 1:50 pm Vince(Quote)
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26042579-5007146,00.html
September 8th, 2009 at 2:14 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
I feel slightly ripped off, they could have at least acknowledged me
.
September 17th, 2009 at 9:33 pm Carla(Quote)
I am curvy but not overweight and am certainly not a 200kg fatty.
As a woman, it’s pretty hard not to have that little bit of belly. It’s a pretty hard area to keep firm.
I ride horses everyday and still have that little bit of curviness.
I don’t think it’s fair to judge. I think she has a beautiful body and that healthy curviness should be celebrated!
September 17th, 2009 at 10:47 pm Sue(Quote)
I first note that there is no picture of you – interesting. The woman pictured is not overweight by any stretch of the imagination and as a massage therapist with over 10 years experience I can say she is fairly normal. In particular women that have had children, no matter how thin often have a ‘belly’. Our bodies come in all shapes and sizes and I’ve never seen a perfect one yet. It always amuses me that men can be so critical of a women’s body, but fail to look in the mirror at their own – as I said – not one perfect one yet – male or female!
September 17th, 2009 at 11:31 pm Vince(Quote)
Men, regardless of how they look themselves, are visual creatures by nature, not by choice. You can find it amusing all you want, but it’ll never change.
September 18th, 2009 at 1:33 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
I’m that little bar of soap on the top right.
I didn’t actually say she was overweight (thighs aside). The point I was making is not whether she was overweight or not but rather that celebrating obesity is a slippery slope. As a massage therapist I’m sure you’ve done you’re fair share of rolling of the eyes when fatty wants a massage. I’m sure you agree it’s not something we want to encourage or suggest is ‘normal’.
September 30th, 2009 at
[...] my protests, “Let’s not celebrate the fatties just yet“, the fact is that fatty numbers have exploded in the last decade has brought with it [...]
August 23rd, 2010 at 4:19 am Trish(Quote)
I really think your article is unfortunate. Although I don’t support encouraging people to be fat, this is a woman’s magazine, and their goal is to sell magazines.
If women want to see images of bigger women, the mag will give them what they want. This woman in the picture is sooo not fat; I am fatter than her and my BMI is in the top healthy range. If this is what you are saying is encouraging obesity and health problems, you are taking it too far; that is a normal very healthy size for a young woman who does not spend 3 hours in the gym daily.
I think if I were her I’d probably want to lose a few, for sure, to look killer ina bikini and all that vain stuff, but unhealthy?
Please.
August 24th, 2010 at 1:50 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
I wasn’t suggesting she was fat but I do believe it’s a slippery slope of increasing the waistlines presented in magazines and what not.today it’s 80kg women, next year 90kg is the new 80kg and before long photographing whales is healthy.
I agree too thin is no good but I don’t want to see fatties on billboards and what not just because some women can’t stop stuffing their faces and have insecurity issues.
April 3rd, 2011 at 12:33 am JenStren(Quote)
Are you crazy??? Are you saying that woman is 90kg? Are you even female? She’s nowhere NEAR that weight….
If she had on clothes, you would never know she had that belly – almost every woman older than 25 has a belly like that.
ESPECIALLY if she’s had kids. Once you have children, you have to get that flap of skin CUT off to look like the models in magazines. Why do you think so many young girls have body issues? Because they get the SKINNIEST FRIGGIN’ PEOPLE ON THE PLANET to pose in magazines.
All the comments on this site are absolutely disgusting… you people are WAY off and need to realize that only 20% of the female population strut around in teensie weensie bikinis… I cannot BELIEVE you think ANYTHING about that woman is large in any way. Grow up.
April 3rd, 2011 at 3:01 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Are you crazy? Nobody ever said Miller was 90kg.
Yeah, maybe in Australia where 60% of the adult population are now obese.
I can assure you outside of Australia flabby bellies like that are certainly not the norm (with US and the UK being notable exceptions).
If you gave birth to king kong maybe, but there’s plenty of mums around with decent looking bellies. Go down to the beach and check out the women with kids… a lot of fatties sure but not everyone retains a flab flap after birth.
And this ladies and gentlemen is fat acceptance. Lizzie Miller, as noted in the article is fine – but definitely borderline. The problem is more fat women look at her and go ‘hey if she’s fine, than so am I!’ and before you know it elephants at Melbourne Zoo want in on fashion week.
There’s got to be a cutoff somewhere and Lizzie Miller is probably ball park figure around that cut off point where you look at someone and go yeah, they’re fat. This goes for men and women.
April 3rd, 2011 at 8:11 pm BUSHRAT(Quote)
Hmm, yair, but I am a leg and bum bloke myself…….
April 4th, 2011 at 12:29 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Really? Never looked at a belly and gone ‘holy shit that tummy’s so hot I want to do it RIGHT NOW’?
Maaaate, dunno what you’re missing out on!
Mind you, running around the beach in your speedos or shorts with mothers and children present, if it hasn’t happened then that’s probably a good thing.
Recreational hazard for the rest of us…