Rudd & the UN: Putting personal gain before the nation
Something didn’t sit right with me when Kevin Rudd was ousted from the Labor Party back in June.
Despite copping a bit of flak over the proposed mining resources tax, the hanging over of Australia’s top job to Julia Gillard felt rushed and a little too well staged.
Then there was Rudd’s reaction, well if you could call it a reaction. Apart from trying to appear genuine in his farewell speech there pretty much wasn’t any reaction on his part. Well short of what you’d expect from someone who’s just been voted out of the Prime Minister’s office by his own party.
I’m not suggesting Rudd had to go all Mark Latham on Labor but some sort of reaction would have been well, normal. Meanwhile speculation was rife over what exactly went down after it was confirmed that Rudd and Gillard had a private chat before the reigns of the nation were signed over to Gillard.
Both parties have sworn themselves to total secrecy. Bugger the Australian public who voted them in, you lot aren’t worthy enough to be told how Australia’s first female Prime Minister came to be.
Following his ousting Rudd for the most part disappeared and has only just recently resurfaced with the 2010 federal election only weeks away. Amazingly he’s all smiles and appears to have completely stifled the normal reaction anyone else should have had when put in his position.
Well, anyone else who wasn’t expecting it… or worse still had a hand in it.
Kevin Rudd’s UN ambitions have never been a secret. As Prime Minister Rudd didn’t acquire the nickname Kevin 747 for nothing. Every other week it felt like Rudd was off on yet another trip to the world stage to further strengthen Australia’s his own political ties with world leaders.
The $11.5 million dollar UN security council bid and general UN friendly policies didn’t hurt either. Despite most of them coming at the expense of Australia.
Policy wise practically everything Rudd will be remembered for appears to have been done to shed himself in a good light with the UN.
One of the first things Rudd did when appointed PM was to apologise to Aboriginals. That alone must have been worth about a gabillion bleeding heart points and was definitely something the UN took notice of. Then came the Kyoto treaty signing, the dismantling of Howard’s Pacific Solution, buttering up Australia with stimulus handouts, financially ignoring anyone who wasn’t a ‘working family’ and trying to appear worldly by publicly weighing in on trivial matters.
Honestly I lost count of the amount of times I read in the news ‘Kevin Rudd weighs in on why Obama’s pet dog is obese’ etc. The line between Prime Minister and social commentator wasn’t just blurred, it simply didn’t exist under Rudd.
Following his ousting from Labor I half expected an announcement that he had been guaranteed a job at the UN or would be managing a less demanding role in the Labor cabinet, so that he could focus on what was important; getting himself into the UN.
Despite being tipped to pickup the Foreign Affairs portfolio this didn’t happen. Perhaps though that was a blessing in disguise.
Today it was announced that Rudd has finally got himself a foothold into the UN after being appointed to a ‘United Nations panel on global sustainability‘. A position much more fitting for future UN ambitions than the lowly job of running Australia.
Despite running in the 2010 federal election what I believe we are seeing here from Rudd is the start of what is going to be an ongoing campaign to eventually get himself ranked in the UN. I can only imagine the satisfaction someone like Rudd would get in waving his finger at Australia over our supposed rotten treatment of Aboriginals, illegal boat people asylum seekers and working families.
This greater ambition also explains the complete submissiveness Rudd has shown to Labor despite being kicked out of the top job. Some might call it party loyalty, I call it a long term diplomatic strategy.
It’s much easier to get into the UN when you’re not burdened with running a second tier country (our official rank in the G20 summit). Three years of ambition sacrifice was enough, roll out the red carpet folks… it’s Kevin’s time to shine.
Meanwhile as a member of the Australian public, I can’t help but feel slightly used. I’m not exactly sure what qualifies as a political one night stand but Kevin Rudd’s reign as Prime Minister surely comes close.
Related posts that might interest you:



August 10th, 2010 at 3:37 pm cbp(Quote)
Rudd wants to be in the UN… so what? He’s always been involved in foreign affairs, that’s where his expertise lies.
I don’t think this conspiracy theory adds up – the stigma of being booted as prime minister after less than a term is just too great.
Sure we were used – but not by Rudd and I suspect not by Gillard, but by other elements of the Labor party and by the dimwitted public that let it happen.
August 10th, 2010 at 4:02 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Well for starters I have an issue with someone using the Prime Minister position of Australia to further their global political ambitions. Then there’s the issue of him dictating policy based on the agenda of making himself look good to the UN, whilst addressing bugger all national policy where it counts.
Practically everything Rudd did politically as Prime Minister was all an effort to showboat on a global stage.
Remember the 2020 summit? You don’t get much bigger thinking then that. Meanwhile what affect did the 2020 summit have for your average Australian? Bugger all.
In taking it graciously, staying loyal to the party and remaining in politics, Rudd’s basically shown the UN they can walk all over him and it’ll be alright. Why talk up your subservience when you can demonstrate it. It’s also a public declaration that he’s got time on his hands, y’know – just in case they haveany offers on the table.
If anything, Gillard has come out as the villian in the leadership transition; again playing to Rudd’s advantage.
August 10th, 2010 at 4:21 pm Erica(Quote)
All PMs / presidents use their position somehow to further their own ambitions. it’s common in politics!
August 10th, 2010 at 8:26 pm cbp(Quote)
If balanced with integrity, ambition makes for better politicians. I would hope that our politicians do aspire to impress on the world stage. Of course that needs to be balanced with honesty and integrity, but I don’t think it is a problem per se.
Well I can see where you’re coming from, but I don’t necessarily see his behaviour as nefarious: Rudd comes from a background of almost 30 years in foreign affairs. I think it is natural for Prime Ministers to play to their strengths – Howard’s term focused largely on advancement of free-market principals for example; On the flip side, perhaps that’s why a domestic issue like the mining tax was ultimately Rudd’s undoing.
Remember too there was particular mood back in 2007/2008, coming on the back of Bush’s destruction of sympathy for the West, and the rise of China, in which things like international summits and Chinese-speaking Prime Ministers seemed like a swell idea to most people. The 2020 summit was popular at the time and supported by the Liberals – I don’t think it needed to be dictated.
August 10th, 2010 at 9:32 pm James(Quote)
What sort of reaction from krudd would’ve been satisfactory in your opinion, considering what happened?
Is being the first Prime Minister to blubber on live TV not enough?
August 12th, 2010 at 3:58 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
@Erica
Ambition furthering might be common but at the greater expense of the country their governing perhaps not. Rudd put his own amibitions so far ahead of Australia that his own party had enough and decided it was best to let him pursue his UN ambitions from the sidelines.
He’s been selected to join this sustainability thing less then three months out from being Prime Minister… that in itself is no co-incidence as it’s not likely a position he’s have been able to join had he still have been our Prime minister.
@James
One that wasn’t fake nor a desperate bid to mask his great intentions or the fact that it was all staged so as to minimise collateral damage to Labor.
“I wanna be head of the UN!’
“Well we want to win the next bloody election!’
“Right, let’s work this out so that Joe average has no idea they’ve been played.’
@cbp
Rudd’s idea of impressing people was to run around and get in as many photo ops as possible. Hell he probably ensured the papers that snapped him were hand delivered to the head of the UN himself.
Australia itself didn’t really get much benefit from all of Rudd’s travels. We were downgraded to B grade status at G20 and no matter how hard Rudd tried Obama still wouldn’t visit him.
I guess someone who’s sole ambition it is to rule the UN probably isn’t best suited to being the Prime Minister of Australia then. Thankfully that appears to have been how it’s played out, although I just wish he hadn’t been given three years to run amok with our country as he saw fit.
I think the Liberals supported 2020 after realising it was going ahead whether they liked it or not. I saw it as nothing more then your typical waste-of-time Labor ‘let’s form a committee to discuss it’ time wasting.
August 12th, 2010 at 10:55 am erica(Quote)
i agree with what you said fully. while ur in tw, try understand politics more and u will know all politicians are playing with the government. even worse in asia!
August 12th, 2010 at 2:24 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Yeah I’ve heard about the crazy that exists in Taiwan’s politics. Gotta get that Chinese up to scratch though if I want to truly understand what’s going on.
From what I’ve seen the English newspapers here are quite tame.
Once my Chinese is up and running there’s a whole new world of media for me to explore and write about.
August 17th, 2010 at 1:48 am Leigh(Quote)
I fully agree with this story.. i was thinking in this direction then i thought i’d google if anyone had similar ideas about it all and i fortunately come across your blog, well done sir.
August 19th, 2010 at 6:20 pm bushrat(Quote)
Yair, and now we gotta decide on Saturday wether we want to be screwed over by the left or the right for the next 3 years!
Some friggin choice!
September 26th, 2010 at 10:11 pm Glenn P.(Quote)
What a pathetic article. You whinge that Rudd puts himself before the nation; but you’re deliberately slandering Rudd because you’re a rabid right-wing ideologue.
The exact opposition is in fact the truth. Rudd is putting the national interest ahead of personal interests, while the nasty, career driven parasites of the Liberal party and their gutless satellites are doing everything in their power to ruin this nation’s and reputation because they hate the world, everything but a backwards, dying America.
They’re redneck Luddite Tory flat-Earthers who are a detriment to our society and species.
September 27th, 2010 at 4:43 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Surprise surprise Rudd got given the foreign ministry portfolio and is already off on whirlwind tours of the globe at our expense.
You can call it right wing ideologue or whatever, but the fact of the matter is that for the past three years Australia had a prime minister who was more interested in joining the UN than giving a stuff about what happened back home.
After 2020, saying sorry to the Aboriginals and rectifying Kyoto (all ‘look at me’ actions designed to attract the UN’s attention), what exactly do you remember about the Rudd government?
Other then Julia’s backstabbing, plunging the country into debt with plasma tv stimulus packages and fair shake of the sacue bottle – I don’t come up with much.
May 12th, 2011 at 2:25 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
Seems Australians are set to cough up an extra two billion dollars to fulfil Rudd’s personal goals.
Wonderful, between spending 800 million on Malaysian certified asylum seekers and Rudd’s midlife crisis, does anyone having a hard time swallowing Labor’s tough budget?
With a 3.5 billion surplus projected for 2012-2013, why don’t we inject 2 billion back into the economy and just end our pointless UN bid.
I know part of Rudd’s golden handshake was securing this seat but at what cost? I’d be pissed too if I wasn’t able to get my little cushy UN seat after giving up the PrimeMinistership in a sneaky backdoor deal, but how is that Australia’s fault?
Why should we pay for Labor’s horrible internal mismanagement?