Yesterday morning in Miranda, Sydney, a man or woman dressed in a burqa robbed a man at gunpoint.

Then, less then 24 hours later over in the UK

a cross-dressing robber wearing a burqa and hijab tricked jewelers into opening their door, only for an armed gang to raid the store.

The man, dressed in traditional Islamic women’s clothes, rang the doorbell at the Capri Jewellers in Bury, in the northern English county of Lancashire on Wednesday afternoon.

But as soon as he was buzzed in, a further three men – including one with a shotgun – stormed the store.

The group stole a large amount of jewelry, including bangles, rings and lockets, before escaping in a waiting car.


In the shadow of a 24 hour burqa clad crime spree, South Australian Senator Cory Bernadi has labelled the burqa as un-Australian and called for its ban.

I for one wholeheartedly agree with him.

On the entry ‘Ban the Burqa’ Senator Bernadi wrote yesterday on his personal blog;

In my mind, the burqa has no place in Australian society. I would go as far as to say it is un-Australian.

To me, the burqa represents the repressive domination of men over women which has no place in our society and compromises some of the most important aspects of human communication.


Despite the recent crimes involving the use of a burqa it’s refreshing to see a public figure willing to enter discussion on the matter from a rational cultural viewpoint.

Religion is left at the door and Bernadi seems to share similar views as I do on non-religious reasons the burqa should be banned.

Put simply, the burqa separates and distances the wearer from the normal interactions with broader society.

Equality of women is one of the key values in our secular society and any culture that believes only women should be covered in such a repressive manner is not consistent with the Australian culture and values.


This is usually when people start to chime in with ‘oh but the burqa is actually massively empowering for women, it’s their choice and such a strong one at that!’

Take for example ‘Assisting Shift in Multicultural Australia’ director Janine Evans’ retort to Senator Bernadi’s comments;

To say it doesn’t fit with our way of life and culture shuts the door to (Muslim) women becoming active members of society.

Sorry but the only thing shutting the door on muslim women becoming active members of Australian society are the burqas they are wearing themselves. If what you wear stops me from communicating properly with you then I have no time for you.

By completely veiling yourself you’re also sending out a strong cultural message that you are clearly not interested in being a integrated part of Australian society.

Keysar Trad from the Islamic Friendship Association puts up an equally flimsy argument;

Wearing the burqa actually encouraged women to integrate into Australian society, whereas a ban would only force them indoors where they’d “miss out on the vitamin D”.

It’s tantamount to denying them the right to drive, the right to enjoy all the services of society as well as equal opportunity


Firstly how are women dressed from head to toe in cloth getting any vitamin D anyway? And secondly a ban wouldn’t force them indoors, their religion would.

As for equal opportunity, one only needs to look at the recent case in Italy where Amel Marmouri was fined for wearing a burqa in public.

In response to the fine Marmouri’s husband Ben Salah Braim stated

We knew about the law and I know that (the law) is not against my religion but now Amel will have to stay indoors. I can’t have other men looking at her.If the law says she can’t wear one then she will have to stay inside night and day. There is nothing I can do.


Is he talking about another human being or a pet dog?! Clearly Salah Braim sees his wife as nothing more then property to be dictated to.

It’s no secret that the burqa is widely seen as a tool of female oppression, given that it’s religious requirement is not mentioned anywhere explicitly in the Quran. Salah Braim’s comments above clearly shatter the illusion that these women have any choice in the matter.

Every time I see a woman in a burqa I know that she’s in it because her husband believes as a male I’m unable to control any urges and at the very sight of her unclothed flesh of course want nothing else then to rape his wife.

How utterly insulting.

For me face to face interaction is a pretty important part of day to day communication. Whether I’m living in Australia, Taiwan or anywhere else in the world it doesn’t matter. Facial expression is a core component of subconscious communication and if I can avoid it, I’d rather not engage in people so self righteous they choose to exclude themselves from this cultural practice.

It’s on these grounds I’d love to see the burqa banned. Sadly I fear that if there’s a continued rise in burqa crime however, that these valid communication and cultural concerns will take a back seat to fear mongering and bigotry as primary reasons to ban the burqa.

Some might argue that it’s already too late.



Related posts that might interest you:
  1. Would a burqa ban stop burqa crime?
  2. It’s official: Burqa + crime = get off scot free
  3. The burqa has no place in any courtroom
  4. Top 5 non-religious reasons to ban the burqa
  5. Sharia law in Australia? It’s already here.