7-11 Taiwan in-house heist goes horribly wrong

Thirty years old and married, Yang Cheng-wen (楊政文) was the manager of a 7-11 convenience store on Songren Road in Taipei City.
A bit of a party animal, Yang had amassed debts of over $80,000 TWD ($2700 TWD) with frequent visits to brothels hostess bars and nightclubs.
Rather than simply stop living a lifestyle his pay grade couldn’t support, in an effort to settle his debts Yang came up with a devious plan.
Armed with the “insider” knowledge that ‘ all stores carry insurance and would receive a compensation payout in case of a robbery‘, Yang and four of his mates hatched a cunning plan to rob a neighbouring 7-11 store, managed by one of Yang’s personal friends.
So the story goes, last Friday Yang entered the Hulin Street 7-11 and approached the manager, surnamed Kung (龔), for a chat.
This action by Yang was the predetermined signal for his mates, Kuo (a friend), Chen (a current 7-11 employee, Lee (a former 7-11 employee) and another Chen (some random teenager), to wait for Kung to exit the store before robbing her.

Carrying the store’s take and on her way to make a bank deposit, the Lee and Kuo succesfully executed the plan and made away on a scooter with $600,000 TWD ($20,200 USD).
Not wanting to look in on the heist, Yang yelled “I’ll chase after them!” before leaving the scene of the crime on his own scooter.
After disappearing in pursuit for what he believed to be a credible amount of time, Yang returned to the Hulin St 7-11 and upon police arriving at the scene, told them “I gave them a good chase, but I lost them’.
As part of their investigations, police reviewed the CCTV footage of the surrounding area – and that’s where things started to fall apart.
CCTV footage revealed that just two blocks away from the Hunlin Street store, Yang met up with the four robbers and after giving eachother celebratory highfives, then returned to the store.
Further analysis of CCTV footage at Yang’s Songren Road 7-11 revealed the five of them later meeting up at the store, making their way to the second floor of the building and then distributing the loot amongst themselves.
Having seemingly learnt nothing from the experience of racking $80,000 in debt, the five of them hit up a local brothel hostess bar and blew through $58,000 TWD ($1600 USD).
By Tuesday police figured they had obtained enough evidence to close in and arrested the five friends. Since the arrests though, police have only managed to recover $290,000 TWD.
Amazingly the above escapade was actually a revised plan, with Yang originally proposing the five rob his own store.
Yang’s friends however, Lee and Kuo, apparently didn’t like the idea and talked him out of it. I’d say they probably thought it was a stupid idea but then these are the same guys who went ahead with the above heist so who knows.
In response to the robbery, 7-11 Taiwan ‘vowed to strengthen its monitoring and management of cash storage and deposit procedures’.
Good luck trying to protect yourselves against morons guys…
7-11 pay their basic staff just over $100 TWD ($3.35 USD) an hour and whilst I’ve got no idea what a manager makes there, I imagine it isn’t all that much more.
Heads up 7-11 Taiwan, you get what you pay for.



February 9th, 2013 at 12:47 pm Jeff L.(Quote)
What is the minimum wage in Taiwan? ~104 NT per hour?
On another note, CCTV can be such a bitch (for the bad guys).
February 9th, 2013 at 12:59 pm Oz(Quote)
According to reports I’ve read regarding the issue of double pay during this CNY, the current minimum wage in Taiwan is $108 TWD an hour.
February 9th, 2013 at 3:29 pm mike(Quote)
“Heads up 7-11 Taiwan, you get what you pay for.”
Robbery is not a consequence of low pay.
February 9th, 2013 at 3:38 pm Oz(Quote)
It is when you have idiots spending more than they earn in brothels and racking up debt.
The type of 30 year olds who work for $108 TWD or so an hour generally didn’t arrive at that situation due to a series of well thought out and planned choices in their life.
February 9th, 2013 at 3:50 pm mike(Quote)
So if they’d paid him at a higher rate, this wouldn’t have happened?
February 9th, 2013 at 4:42 pm Oz(Quote)
You’re assuming he’d have qualified for the position at a higher rate of pay.
A higher rate of pay attracts a higher grade of canditate (it also attracts the scrubs too but generally they get weeded out).
The above of course isn’t bulletproof and exceptions do occur.
February 9th, 2013 at 5:26 pm mike(Quote)
I’m not assuming anything. You are: “A higher rate of pay attracts a higher grade of canditate…”
February 9th, 2013 at 7:05 pm Oz(Quote)
Well if you want to be the oddball and sell yourself short, more power to you I guess.
February 9th, 2013 at 7:37 pm mike(Quote)
The point is elementary logic, Oz. This guy robbed the 7-11 because he was a stupid cunt, not because his pay grade was low. There are plenty of other people with low pay who don’t commit robbery. Why? Because they are not stupid cunts. See?
Low pay is neither here nor there.
February 10th, 2013 at 10:42 am Oz(Quote)
Yes but surely you’d agree “stupid cunt” + low pay = more chance of a robbery occuring? Well, at least the hilarious F-grade of robbery we’re talking about here.
Let’s not downplay the correlation between theft, low pay and “stupid cunt” debt.
February 10th, 2013 at 3:45 pm blobOfNeurons(Quote)
How much does the manager of a 7-11 make anyway?
February 10th, 2013 at 6:43 pm mike(Quote)
What correlation?
February 10th, 2013 at 7:14 pm Oz(Quote)
Y’know… that one.
@blob Not sure, can’t be more than 300 TWD an hour though.
February 10th, 2013 at 9:14 pm mike(Quote)
You don’t even know what the word “correlation” means do you?
February 10th, 2013 at 9:21 pm Oz(Quote)
Happy new year. Check it.
NOW DANCE LIKE A MONKEY!
February 12th, 2013 at 12:12 am ausGeoff(Quote)
You’re kidding me….?
A (Ozedit: crossing the line there) 7-11 takes in 20 grand a day [$600,000 TWD ($20,200 USD)]…. 7 mil per annum?
WTF?
February 13th, 2013 at 12:51 pm Jeff L.(Quote)
Score one for racism, amiright, ausGeoff?
February 13th, 2013 at 2:14 pm Oz(Quote)
Yeah can’t say I’m a fan of the term myself.
As for 7-11 Taiwan revenue, they are much more useful than the ones in Australia. Dunno if that $600,000 TWD was a day’s take but people use the 7-11s here for everything.
I’d only visit them in Australia for the odd slurpee in summer, here in Taiwan I’m in there what feels like at least once a day. Not for slurpees though, the bastards shut them off during winter (tommorow is going to be 31 degrees and sunny!)
February 13th, 2013 at 6:38 pm ausGeoff(Quote)
Methinks you’ve been away from Australia too long Oz hehe…
February 13th, 2013 at 7:15 pm ausGeoff(Quote)
I think you’re deliberately distorting the intent of my post here Jeff.
I was making the point that I couldn’t believe that any 7-11 store could possibly take that much in a single day’s trading. And we all know how—to Western eyes at least—Asian businesses somehow manage work against all odds… or don’t.
And I know for a fact that there’d not be any 7-11 stores in Australia making 20 grand a day.
It was nothing to do with “racism”. Your comment introducing the “racist” element was—possibly, and inadvertently—to assuage your own guilty conscience maybe?
You’re obviously not an Aussie, otherwise you’d be aware that you can hear all these sorts of terms describing foreigners every day on every street corner—even on locally -produced, fictionalised TV series.
At any rate, I can assure you that—having worked overseas myself—such “colourful” terminology is not limited to Westerners by any means.
February 16th, 2013 at 1:24 am Jeff L.(Quote)
When you said the ‘word,’ I take it at face value (if that is the term to use). You have to understand, from an American perspective, it is what it is (to me).
I simply don’t grasp the relationship between the ‘word’ to the amount of profit a 7-11 store can make in a day. I just don’t see the connection.
Once again from my perspective, when you use a racist word, how do you expect people to take it? Can you say with absolute certainty that 0% will take it the wrong way?
Look at the ESPN writer who used a controversial headline back when Jeremy Lin was exposed (or whatever) on his weakness(es) in basketball a few months back. I know the purpose may be different than the current situation, but play along with me here if you would.
When that ESPN writer said what he said (in the headline of the article), I wasn’t offended. I understood what he meant. But his word selection could’ve been a bit better. Anyhow.
Regarding your use of the word, I look at it as it is. I don’t understand how you connected my comment to how it “assuages my own guilty conscience.” I’m not offended by the comment, but I am quite baffled at how a connection like this is made.
Note: It’s 9:24AM atm. If I went off-track or was incoherent somewhere, rephrase and I’ll respond once more. Thanks.