The solution to Taiwan’s 24 hour a day study culture
When you have an education system such as Taiwan’s, one that is designed to train the population to be unquestioning worker drones from the moment they leave the womb, unexpected consequences are bound to occur.
Back in 1999 the BBC ran a story where they cited a report claiming that ‘eighty-five percent of high-school students and ninety percent of university students now need to wear glasses‘.
Indeed, walk around for just five minutes in Taiwan and it feels like half the population is wearing glasses, with the other half no doubt wearing contact lenses.
The report went on to explain that the reason for Taiwan’s atrociously bad eyesight problems was largely because of ‘parents pressuring children to read Chinese characters, play musical instruments and operate computers at a very young age‘.
Fast forward to 2011 and over a decade later, learning Chinese is still a hellish schedule of memorization learnt drilled into young kids, computers are integrated into student’s lives more than ever, and parent’s still demand that their kids be concert-grade pianists before they’ve learnt to even hold chopsticks.
So what’s the solution?
Do you completely overhaul Taiwan’s education system? Make parent’s realise they’re doing some serious harm to their kids? Fund government initiatives to tackle the widespread and growing cultural traditions at the root of the cause?
Hell no.
Just build a few more of these and she’ll be right…

Ladies and gentlemen, spotted at around 2am near Taoyuan City on an early Saturday morning, what you’re looking at there is a 24-hour open optometrist.
Why work towards fundamentally fixing Taiwan’s 24 hour study culture problems when you can just fix it with economical free market convenience?
Round the clock available coke bottle glasses for everyone!
No related posts.



November 6th, 2011 at 10:12 pm mike(Quote)
“Why work towards fundamentally fixing Taiwan’s 24 hour study culture problems when you can just fix it with economical free market convenience?”
When you’re through with your NT$1 laughs, you might consider how education in a free-market would be different.
November 6th, 2011 at 11:07 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Lots of poor people unable to afford education with not even $1 TWD to their name?
November 7th, 2011 at 1:06 pm mike(Quote)
Hey, if you can’t take it – don’t dish it.
November 7th, 2011 at 1:28 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Derailing discussion to massage your own ego is tiresome to read.
I suggest you find a new hobby.
November 8th, 2011 at 12:58 am mike(Quote)
What discussion?
Mine was the first and only comment.
November 17th, 2011 at 6:44 pm Hans(Quote)
Well, why do you think reading (even at low light) is causing any damage to the eyes? Watching things — although I admit reading is probably from somehow short distance — and recognizing shapes is what those organs have been evolved for and is a very natural activity (in contrast to TV/computer screens, which tend to flicker).
However, what seems to be a bigger factor is the air pollution — huge amounts of small particulate matter have been shown to cause eye decay and you might experience gradual (over prolonged periods of time) eyesight worsening too. Still better if you lived here during your childhood, when the eyes develop.
November 17th, 2011 at 6:56 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
Reading alone isn’t damaging their eyes, but have you seen the amount of reading kids here have to do. They spend more time studying (reading on the computer and/or books) then they do doing anything else (including sleeping) from about the age of 3 till they get out university, it’s ridiculous.
And what do they do in their spare time? More computers and/or TV!
I saw on the news yesterday some guy in China being heralded as the greatest parent on Earth because he was the male equivalent of a ‘tiger mom’ (read: beat, punish, threaten to disown/kill yourself/kill your kids – do whatever it takes to get your kids to succeed).
Bet his kids are about as socially adjusted and creative as a door stop. Oh and they probably wear glasses too.
As for pollution, I have no doubt that contributes too but I can’t see it being a stronger factor than constant eye strain for 10-15+ years.
November 18th, 2011 at 3:53 pm Hans(Quote)
I know the drill, no need to underscore it again. However, I stated my cause: reading is natural use of your eyes and doesn’t put it to any extreme use, it’s not like you can “use up” your eyes purely by watching things (in fact, I think I have even seen argument that intensive reading improves eyesight!).
However, _permanent_ (including very young and sensitive age) exposure to small particles (hey, those are often some metals or carcinogens) in my opinion just causes more damage. TV/Computer screen /might/ add to that effect too, even if not directly, the constant visual input tends to make people wink less, leading to dryer eye surface (and the self-cleaning ability suffers)
I really see no reason why a person not reading at all living in a polluted city should have less damaged eyes than one living in a virgin nature reading five books a day (by the way, Taiwanese living in countryside have better eyesight — and don’t they have to go through the same volume of universal education?).
November 19th, 2011 at 9:58 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
I’m not discounting the air pollution, just saying it’s not as harmful as overstraining your eyes so much by not giving them a rest.
Reading itself doesn’t harm your eyes but day in day out reading computer screens and books surely strains them.
As for the country, I imagine the competition is much less compared to the citiies. And compulsory education is only up until year 9 I think, then you can make your kids work on your onion farm or whatever.
November 19th, 2011 at 6:42 pm Hans(Quote)
Yes, it causes eye strain, but eye strain does not endanger in any way the eyesight (if anything, it sounds like a good eye muscle exercise instead).
http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/family/reading-in-dim-light1.htm
That onion farm comment was uninformed… Taiwan’s class barrier is low and universities are basically in every village — just count how many PhDs are running around. If nothing else, isn’t it at the same time discounting your argument about ‘oh so much studying here’?
November 19th, 2011 at 6:44 pm Hans(Quote)
Also, when already providing links, check top medical misconception #1
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2007/12/26/top-seven-health-myths.html
November 19th, 2011 at 7:09 pm Hans(Quote)
Oh, what can one learn from a Sun-like article on your blog
So fact is myopia is associated with high IQ. However, it’s just association and not a causality, so there are both studies concluding that short-sighted people tend to read more (it’s more comfortable, as it doesn’t strain the eyes as much as say, going out hiking) as well as explanations that lack of focus into distance leaves eye muscles untrained for watching distant objects.
And final option is that there are some genes causing short-sightedness and higher IQ at the same time.
However, a portion of Asian population, regardless of the place they grew up, ends up being myopic, which is a strong pointer that there are some some genetic predispositions present. If that’s the case, way more locals will just naturally need glasses and all that shop does is to provide them. You can’t blame anyone for doing that.
November 20th, 2011 at 10:33 am ozsoapbox(Quote)
@Hans
On the onion farm thing, that was tongue in cheek. Even with compulsory education up to year 9 though the kids are still put under a lot of pressure even from pre-kindergarten.
Eyestrain might excercise the eye sure, but constant eyestrain isn’t good. It’s just common sense. Like a bit of strain on your muscles when excercising is good, but walking around carrying 10kg dumbells for 12+ hours a day for 10 years or so isn’t going to do your back, arms and shoulders any favours.
Not convinced. TheDailyBeast states
1. Very little scientific backing is still scientific backing.
2. we’re not talking about temporary strain, we’re talking about constant strain brought about by years of excessive studying (staring into books and monitors).
3. The comment about candlelight is a bit rich. 70 years ago we didn’t have nearly the amount of access to information we have now, nor were computers invented.
Seriously, how many kids in could read and had easy access to literature outside of school 70 years ago in Taiwan?
On the topic of genes yeah I’ll conceede that. I suffered from shitty eyes inherited from my parents too so I’ve experienced it firsthand. Those shitty eyes had to come from somewhere though!
I guess technology is a bit of a double edged sword, we’ve got people studying longer than ever straining their eyes, meanwhile the technology we have now has come at an environmental price further damaging people’s eyesight.
November 20th, 2011 at 12:21 pm Hans(Quote)
In that case “little scientific evidence” doesn’t mean there are only three or four publications on the topic. On the contrary, everyone seems to be crazy to explain the observations, but it’s not as simple as “oh, look, Taiwanese are near-sighted and have plenty of cram schools, that’s sure a reason”.
If you want to back something scientifically, you usually need strong statistical confidence and be able to isolate the subject from all other factors. Good luck with that when it comes to eyes
Like I wrote later, there is even a proven correlation between some things — like high IQ or literacy and myopia. However, proving causality is much more difficult. Maybe just like I said, people who are near-sighted have better chances of getting literate? Maybe literate people have also better quality of life and can afford caring about their eyes (and visiting an eye doctor) more?
I don’t think either of us can answer it with more confidence than people doing research and collecting data in the field for years.
Maybe it’s just genetic and modern Taiwanese lifestyle makes it express more? I’m not defending tiger mothers, but as a person spending way too much time with books (I used to spend all the time after school in a library until they closed) and computer screens and pretty good eyesight at the same time, I’m just not so sure reading can be attributed as the cause so easily.
November 20th, 2011 at 12:28 pm ozsoapbox(Quote)
One thing to think about could also be that just as there is a genetic link for eye problems, the reverse is also most likely probably true. In that there are genetic strains better equipped to deal with constant excessive stress on the eyes.
Kind of like some people can’t spend 10 minutes in the sun without burning and others can go all day everyday in the sun and be fine.